The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph compares four different countries in term of car thefts from 1990 to 1999.
Overall, it is clear that thefts per thousand vehicles in Great Britain were generally higher than all other countries shown in the graph. Sweden saw the car thefts increased while this figure in Canada and Sweden fluctuated.
In 1990, Great Britain have around 17 thefts per 1000 vehicles. This figure was reached the highest point in 1997 with 20 cases. During 9 years period, Great Britain saw a fluctuation on car thefts.
The car thefts in Sweden, France and Canada was low in 1990 with 6, 7 and 8 thefts respectively. While Sweden saw a significantly increase of thefts, this figures in France and Canada reduces. thefts per thousand vehicles in Sweden in 1999 were around 14, while this figures were similared in France and Canada with 6 thefts.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-08 Max Colorado 84 view
2019-07-22 Shivani Miglani 73 view
2018-08-01 ann moses 78 view
2018-07-05 khj 78 view
2018-02-12 staroongirl 73 view
Essays by user bennk2020 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Britain) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...en fluctuated. In 1990, Great Britain have around 17 thefts per 1000 vehicles. Thi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...8 thefts respectively. While Sweden saw a significantly increase of thefts, this figures in France and C...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thefts
...s figures in France and Canada reduces. thefts per thousand vehicles in Sweden in 1999...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...in Sweden in 1999 were around 14, while this figures were similared in France and Ca...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 698.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 144.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84722222222 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44175988951 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 190.8 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8088892716 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.5555555556 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183193117923 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906654191279 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844084035573 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142916419507 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681387805163 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.