The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line chart gives information about the number of vehicles which had stolen by thieves in four different nations over the course of 9 years starting from 1990.
As is illustrated by the graph, it is immediately obvious that the quantity of missing cars experienced an upward trend in Sweden, while there was a fluctuation which demonstrated in Great Britain, France and Canada. Throughout the period, even though G.B witnessed a downward trend in the number of missing cars, it still registered as the highest figures out of all 4 nations surveyed.
At the beginning of the period, the vehicle quantities stolen by car thefts in G.B were nearly 20.000 transportations. Then, during the 9-year period, vehicle theft figures in G.B slightly dropped to approximately 16.000 transportations. On the other hand, Sweden witnessed the car theft rates increased dramatically from under 10.000 to nearly 15.000 missing vehicles.
Noticeably, the trend of France and Canada was totally different since the beginning of the period, stood at 6.000 cars and 7.000 cars respectively. However, two strangers met the other at the end of the period, over 5.000 transportations.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt gives information about the number of vehicles which had stolen by thieves in ...
^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...our different nations over the course of 9 years starting from 1990. As is illus...
^^
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: B
...a. Throughout the period, even though G.B witnessed a downward trend in the numbe...
^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: B
...le quantities stolen by car thefts in G.B were nearly 20.000 transportations. The...
^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: B
...year period, vehicle theft figures in G.B slightly dropped to approximately 16.00...
^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cally from under 10.000 to nearly 15.000 missing vehicles. Noticeably, the tren...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, then, while, as to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28494623656 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0197494228 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5479137571 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.875 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0781738685697 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391340015691 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444056205595 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554305465857 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532718267743 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.