The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph elucidates how many peculations in four different nations Great Betania, Sweden franch Canada in the year between 1990 and 1999.
Overall, it can be manifested that highest number of cars theft in Great Britain. However, French and Canada least thefts per thousand of vehicles but Sweden steadily increase in the last year.
Firstly cars thefts in Sweden, French and Canada it can be seen similar fluctuations over the first year all the remaining 5to10 per thousand. But Sweden increased steadily and it reached in the year 1999 which was theft 15 per thousand. Whereas France and Canada downward trend it can be seen some fluctuation it can be observed and it's steadily stable in the year 1993 to 1997 which was 8per thousand for the former one and 5 per thousand for the latter one. And also it6 per thousand was noticed in the last year in both countries.
Secondly, the highest number of cars theft in Great Britain at 8 per thousand in the year 1990. moreover, it then fluctuated over the next six-year and reaching a peak of 20 thefts per thousand in the year 1996 and ending period it decreases slightly lower than where it began at approximately 17 per thousand.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-06 Lee Daisy view
2023-09-03 Lee Daisy view
2023-03-07 datdatduy1 84 view
2023-03-07 datdatduy1 78 view
2022-07-22 Ngoc21 78 view
Essays by user Patel Romaa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...ain at 8 per thousand in the year 1990. moreover, it then fluctuated over the next six-y...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74879227053 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44529400371 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536231884058 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0280076521 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206057810155 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107311139659 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461167462471 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145406155326 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260308087087 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.