The map below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented two maps indicate a series of modification in a village between 1995 and now.
Generally, the village has changed radically over the period. Indeed, while land for planting and agricultural activities vanished, those of residential areas and sporting infrastructures were expanded substantially.
Turning into detail, regarding to the northern part, there were a medium number of houses distributed on both side of main road, along with a building block near the heart of the village in 1995. From then on, more houses have been built now, with an easier accessibility made by a branch leading off the main road to the additional residential area. Meanwhile, farmland and forest park to the northeast of the village in 1995 were combined before having transformed into a golf court, integrating two tennis courts inside.
Regarding to the southern region, in 1995, boats could approach the local thanks to a fishing port, which led to a fish market on sea shore. In addition, a chain of shops was located opposite to the fish market. However, at present, while the fishing port has been removed, the shops and the fish market have been substituted by a restaurant and apartments. By contrast, along with the café, the hotel remained unchanged despite the construction of an adjacent car park.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-16 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
- Many people think studying in university is a waste of time and money. They are supposed that young people should work for real experience. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people believe that professional athletes serve as positive role models for young people while others argue that their behavior both on and off the field can have a negative influence Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- the only way to improve safety of out roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses.To what extent do you agree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e construction of an adjacent car park.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16355140187 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84895394177 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635514018692 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9934518705 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122550745547 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519896354065 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057957477733 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890543645059 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635410744146 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.