Map : the changes of various facilities in the city between 2007 and 2010.
The map elucidates numerous alterations around the centre of health in the city from 2007 to 2010. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the shape of the road around the city hospital.
To begin with the facilities around healthy institution, in the southwest of the city hospital, there was a new bus station which replaced the place of the bus stop in 2007. Furthermore, 2007 to 2010 witnessed the establishment of the car park of the staff, which was established to alter the position of car park of the staff and public, and the bus stop in previous time, moreover, the vehicle park for public had been constructed in the east part of the city hospital.
In accordance with the alterations of the city road, there are two roundabouts in which it connected to each other via hospital road. The first roundabout was built in the southeast of the new bus station as well as the second roundabout had been developed in the northwest of the new car park for the staff. In contrast, the city hospital remained unchanged over the entire period.
- More and more young people from wealthy nations are doing unpaid work in poorer nations. What are the reasons and who benefits more from this: the communities or young people? 84
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the poor and the rich do you agree or disagree 32
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place in the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, second, so, well, in contrast, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72105263158 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66301747081 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510526315789 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8684201155 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2857142857 5.23603664747 235% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204121231432 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102539651148 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807969210893 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149165097419 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085114685568 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.