the maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip from 2005 to 2010.
The two pictures illustrate how a small town of Islip changed after some developments in a period of 5 years starting from 2005.
Overall, the town underwent a number of modifications after the construction of several facilities.
Looking at the maps in detail, in 2005, there was a main road running from east to west with 2 lines of shops along. There was a rural area to the north of the road while there were 2 housing areas to the south. There was also a large park to the east of the accommodations and a school to the west of these regions. Both the park and the school were connected to the main road by 2 minor roads.
Moving to 2010, the most significant changes were the appearance of a divided highway surrounding the town and a pedestrian precinct which used to be the main road in 2005. To the north of the pedestrian precinct, the line of shops was demolished and replaced by a bus station, a shopping centre, a car park and a new residential area. The new housing region was connected to the dual carriageway by a small route. To the south of the pedestrian precinct, more accommodations were built, the park was also made smaller to make way for this development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-14 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers 78
- Some believe that money for education should mainly be spent on better computers while others believe it would be better spent on teachers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities What are the causes Suggest some measures to reduce traffic in big cities 95
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53488372093 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7750179668 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497674418605 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0412628609 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149851638172 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058948976562 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755048082163 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105213634843 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755938626066 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.