Students in schools and universities learn more from their teachers than through other means such as the Internet, libraries, and TV.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that learners learn more form their teachers than through other resources such as the internet, libraries and TV in schools and universities. I strongly disagree with this statement because the other resources can bring equal benefits as teachers.
On the one hand, I suppose that other resources such as the Internet, libraries and TV can bring some benefits for learners. First of all, these resources provide a variety of knowledge under different types from soft version to hard version that learners can choose appropriately their purpose. Secondly, these resources can update the latest version of knowledge which are provided to users, that help learners to save time to self-updating. The other essential factor of these resources which plays a role as the main resources of learning is fully available. For example, students can easily access to the large knowledge by their smartphone or other devices in everywhere. Therefore, students absolutely can self-learn with the resources particularly the internet, libraries and TV also.
On the other hand, teachers serve the vital in the success of learning that cannot be replaced by other factors. It is obviously that teachers play an important role in inspiring students, which cannot be found from any sources like TV or the internet. In additional, teachers can correct mistakes of studiers and give the proper guidance appropriately specify with situation. For example, when students are in front of the huge knowledge, they will be easily disoriented, or even they can more likely feeling depressed. Then, teachers can provide appropriate adjustments or useful instructions to help their students.
For the reasons mentioned above, I strongly disagree with the statement that studiers learn more form their teachers than through other resources such as the internet, libraries and TV in schools and universities due to the benefits of these resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-21 | levanhoan123 | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that the media such as the press TV and Internet should be more strictly controlled Are you for or against this view 89
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields but not in others Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are need by society Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 52
- It is important for people to take risks in both their professional lives and personal lives Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 788, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...icularly the internet, libraries and TV also. On the other hand, teachers serve t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, i suppose, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40924092409 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85369597097 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481848184818 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5817476324 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.071428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330834280135 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132655606415 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129506934615 0.0667982634062 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266646128838 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108975109602 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.