The maps below show changes that took place Youngsville in New Zealand over a 20-year period from the 1990 to 2010.
The two maps describe the main changes taking place in Youngsville between the years 1990 and 2010.
From an overall perspective, it can be seen from the maps that the whole city has experienced a significant modernization, particularly in the south area.
Looking at the northern river called Alanah, many trees had been cut down in order to make space for a park and car parking facilities. In 1990, there was not any golf court, but 2010 witnessed an erection of a golf court into the north-west of the town. Another striking change is that the stadium was constructed in 2010. Moreover, there was a construction of Marina seaport at the mouth of the river together with the expansion of the railway line to the north of this town.
If we look at the south of the river Alanah, it has been urbanized noticeably and a range of modern facilities have been built, such as skyscrapers, factories, warehouses. The south of this town used to be a green area, with a number of trees, but the trees were removed and replaced by many factories and warehouses. A final notable development is the introduction of skyscrapers in Youngsville town.
- The maps below show changes that took place Youngsville in New Zealand over a 20 year period from the 1990 to 2010 84
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- Children are now less active in their free time than in the past Therefore sports lessons must be compulsory in schools To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or exper 56
- The graph shows the number of visitors to two museums in a country from 2000 to 2015 78
- The issue of environment problems is a subject of much controversy Some people argue that those problems are very large to solve individually Others claim that environment problems can not be solved without personal action 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80303030303 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84517412731 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2981295586 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153652096271 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730288886383 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103366070405 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12914620059 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126151685631 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.