The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand overa 25 year period from 1980 to 2005

The diagrams illustrate the development that occurred in Youngsville, New Zealand from 1980 to 2005.

It is clear from the pictures that the biggest change that happened to the town was the infrastructure. Additionally, there were plenty of trees being chopped down by 2005.

In 1980, the town was covered with trees along with many individual houses and had a lot of changes over the next 25 years. To the south of the Alanan River, the forest has been cleared to create an industrial zone with warehouses and factories surrounding the school and the airport. With that, small houses were replaced by skyscrapers in the southeast along the railway station line.

North of the Alanan River, most of the trees were cut down and there were only a few trees left around the hospital in 2005. A large number of trees cut down gave way to parks, golf courses and parking lots. Previously, there were residential areas in the northeast but later they were demolished and stadiums built. In the same year, near the train station appeared a marina.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...trees left around the hospital in 2005. A large number of trees cut down gave way to parks, golf ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: GAVE_GIVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
... 2005. A large number of trees cut down gave way to parks, golf courses and parking ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87709497207 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54650574102 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597765363128 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8021581896 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132525122814 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056211468831 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734610518171 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108769706482 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857756078505 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.