The provided illustrations demonstrate the main changes which have taken place in Clowick Arts Centre form 2005 to the present.
Overall, a cursory glance at the diagrams is sufficient enough to make it vivid that the centre has experienced significant changes during this period, including relocations, expansions and developments of facilities.
One change that stands out is that the stage, outdoor exhibition and performance area have been developed over the whole period of what was once wasteland. In 2005, there were snack bar and meeting room in the upper right-hand corner and west side of centre respectively; which the former was completely demolished and it has been substituted for two separated meeting rooms while the latter has been expanded and now contains galley.
Another noticeable change is that the drama studio and the central exhibition have been built next to the meeting room 1 and in the middle of the centre respectively. In former days, concert hall and cinema were in the same building which it was opposite to the gallery 1 and gallery 2; however, today, the cinema has been moved to the top of the centre and concert hall has been constructed and substituted for two galleries which were located at the west side of centre. The information desk experiences no change, while the new-smaller toilet has relocated next to the concert hall in the bottom right-hand corner of the centre.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 84
- Today more and more people use robots to do tasks at home and at work Do you think it is positive or negative why 11
- There are more and more effective security measures in large cities to reduce the crime Does this endeavour bring more benefits than problems 84
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 95
- In the past knowledge was contained in books Nowadays knowledge is uploaded to the internet Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ansions and developments of facilities. One change that stands out is that the s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09871244635 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76864288253 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536480686695 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.868180849 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.714285714 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2857142857 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0919367827731 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469330376691 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409907869496 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688205985238 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421324370609 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 61.2550243902 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.