Today, more and more people use robots to do tasks at home and at work. Do you think it is positive or negative? why?
Nowadays, up-to-the-minute, technology-based devices have been manufactured and also permeated into whole human beings’ life aspects. However, new-before-seen types of technology-related machines, robots specifically, have brought about countless issues of concern. Personally, I fully concur with the surmise that robots’ existence is associated with numerous merits than detrimental ramifications. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall vividly explore why robots have become irrefutable in modern-day lives before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
To commence with, there are a number of causes exist that why robots are a blessing for humankind. Robots could expedite the manufacturing process and have inimitable performance in repetitive tasks. Additionally, they could be utilized round-the-clock service, which could also prompt the productivity and profitability of the companies to leap significantly. In addition, robots have always been exploited to operate elaborately complicated surgeries. Thus, there is no doubt that robots have had a significant beneficial bearing on all facets of human life.
Another merit worth mentioning is that these machines could always operate in an extreme situation that would be unendurable for human beings. For instance, when the catastrophic tsunami associated with the disastrous earthquake in the Sea of Japan befell, the Fukushima reactors undertook calamitous damages. Robots were utilized to scrutinize the nuclear environments since individuals had no chance to access the radioactive regions. Furthermore, these machines also helped a great deal in rescue operations. As a result, people could elude hazardous situations when a disaster occurs by delegating the task to robots.
To conclude, it could be reiterated that the controversy has mostly been portrayed as a revival of traditionalism-versus-industrialism confrontation-this time over the practicability of robots and merits and demerits associated with the usage of modern machines within people’s life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-12 | ashkan zaheri | 11 | view |
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- At present the mass media is very influential and the lives of many people are affected by the news Why do you think this is happening Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 84
- The chart below gives some information about the growth of the urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories with different proportions among residents in the UK 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 550, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... before a reasoned conclusion is drawn. To commence with, there are a number of ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in addition, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.12280701754 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.8817802505 2.80592935109 138% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645614035088 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6517925511 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.073727944622 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270641942062 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.02281962688 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0462612429121 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00942759825003 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.