In the past knowledge was contained in books Nowadays knowledge is uploaded to the internet Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages

in this modern era, high-technology-based devices facilitate communications. In fact, emergence of the internet ensues by rapid dissemination of information all around the globe. In this respect, an unprecedented confrontation of traditionalism-versus-industrialism has been debated among critics. While some circles perceive that alienation from traditional way of representing knowledge and information could bring about detrimental ramifications, personally, I concur with surmise that new ways of propagation of data have pernicious effects on humans' life. In forthcoming paragraphs, I shall vividly highlight both merits and demerits of the proposal before a conclusion is reached.
In regards to disadvantages, there are diverse reasons existed why some support paper-based propagation of data, Firstly, although the internet is almost widespread in every part of the world, some people have no proper access to the web-based data. Furthermore, quite number of senior citizens do not feel comfortable to use high-technology communicating devices, such as smartphones and laptops. Primarily, knowledge on the web usually accompany with mendacious information, since there are no legal organizations in order to vet the provided data. Thus, it might understandable why some people feel that knowledge must be incorporated in books.
On the other hand, in spite of the aforementioned reasons, I believe that uploading information at the internet has multifarious merits which should be mentioned. First, from an environmental prospective, paper industry annually bring about massive deforestation and also inevitably accompany with catastrophic consequences on the environment and ecosystem, including decimation of endangered species, aggravating effects on the global warming, emerging diseases and also consecutive famine and droughts, Furthermore, authorities, scientists, economists and experts disseminate practical up-to-dated information in the internet without spending time in order to undergoing time-wasting process of making a book.
to conclude, although some demerits could be emerged due to uploading knowledge online, I fully endorse the conjecture and strongly perceive that advantages of the mentioned proposal would outweigh its drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
in this modern era, high-technology-based ...
^^
Line 1, column 549, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...tion of data have pernicious effects on humans life. In forthcoming paragraphs, I shal...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...posal before a conclusion is reached. In regards to disadvantages, there are diverse reason...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...time-wasting process of making a book. to conclude, although some demerits could ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, thus, while, in fact, such as, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.19365079365 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.88623816367 2.80592935109 139% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653968253968 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.633147594 49.4020404114 248% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.583333333 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161200027518 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052761267507 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373494563044 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956303359328 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035970491428 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.0946893788 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 11.25 50.2224549098 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.2 11.3001002004 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.92 12.4159519038 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.19 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.