The maps give information about a university sports court.
The process compares the layout of a university sports court in 1990 and at present. Overall, the court has been expanded and there is a new introduction and reconstruction of some facilities.
Starting with 1990, there was a park in the top-left corner of the map and under it was a car park. An outdoor swimming pool was located in the opposite side of the park and next to it were a café and a reception. There was a changing room under the reception and behind it was a tennis court.
Moving to the court at present. The most striking change is that the park has been cut down to make way for a basketball court. Moreover, the previous place of a car park was replaced by a tennis court while the café and the reception were remained unchanged during the given period. Another notable different is that the outdoor pool in the top- right corner of the map has been reconstructed to an indoor one and the changing room was expanded. Finally, the former place of the tennis court was transformed into a fitness center now.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-17 | lalo | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-14 | Feresew | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | thuphuong2302 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below
- The maps give information about a university sports court 61
- Some people think that big companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe children should be free to do what they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone Do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51336898396 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56538505723 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497326203209 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8196873242 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154407003329 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734504213642 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059423453211 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124948725073 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643530509311 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51336898396 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56538505723 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497326203209 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8196873242 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154407003329 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734504213642 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059423453211 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124948725073 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643530509311 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.