The maps show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The two pictures illustrate how had the art gallery have changed from 1950 to the present.
It can be seen in the maps, the gallery had significant renovated after the reconstruction and reorganised of a few facilities over the years.
The entrance and the sculpture are stay the same as it used to be in the middle. On the left of the gallery, things remained the same still the familiar bookshop and exhibition, except the children art school which is converted from a part of the old courtyard. There is also a new toilet now which is next to the cafe. The rest of the old courtyard is now become the Australian Aboriginal Art section and Australian Art have moved next to it. On the right of the gallery from the entrance, there is a new Asia Art gallery which the Australian Art took place back in the 1950. Beside that, Early and Middle European Art were unchanged through the years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 56
- Many people use social media every day to keep in touch with friends and get social news Do you think the advantages of it outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 731.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54037267081 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56373560439 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4740172064 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.375 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150933147206 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644481231131 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506014623409 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934530518321 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442437255576 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.