the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001
The two maps illustrate how the facilities in Felixstone have been changed over the period of nearly 4 decades from the opening in 1967 to 2021.
As can be seen from the pictures, the infrastructure in an area near the beach has been dramatically transformed after the construction of several upgraded facilities over the given period.
In 1967, to the east of the area where the sea is there was previously a fishing industry, with a fishing market and Marina pier as well. On the left side, there was a huge main building and a cafe adjacent to the beach. On the other side of the road by 2 two lines of four shops which are located on the right side of the Golf course. Looking over the opposite side of the road, the hotel and dunes are located in the bottom left corner.
Turning to the 2001 day map, visitors could access farmland in the northeast. However, now they can stay in an upscale hotel which includes a swimming pool and 2 tennis courts. Looking over the opposite side of the road, both the fish market and Marina pier for the community were removed to the left area. In place of that, this area was used for the private beach instead. One dune near the beach was replaced with wind turbines, and the car park was established along the west road.
- schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in a foreign country Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks 56
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 84
- The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1 000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48275862069 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34970334859 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564655172414 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4320576594 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5454545455 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126454918119 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475946037712 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768843669273 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954710268883 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096060557062 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48275862069 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34970334859 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564655172414 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4320576594 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5454545455 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126454918119 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475946037712 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768843669273 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954710268883 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096060557062 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.