The maps show how the town of Harborne changed from 1936 to 2007.
The map describes the development of the town of Harborne from almost a rural area into an urban city from 1936 to 2007.
In 1936, the town was just like a rural area and had few buildings. In the center of the town, there were two parallel curbs which include the post office the candy shop and the butchers in the top curb, and in the bottom curb, there include the flower shop, a bank and the library. In the northwest of the town, there were three trees grown there, and in the northeast, there was a river. Furthermore, there was a road for cycling, the government offices of the town and a piece of beautiful farmland in the south of the town.
In 2007, there has been a significant change in this town. After 71 years, there had been a residential surrounding the river and the government offices and farmland had changed into a museum and golf course. Furthermore, the centre of the town had supermarket and shopping centre which changed from the candy shop, butchers and the vacant lot. Two trees had been chopped and the road for cycling had changed into a curved road.
- The illustration shows a bicycle which is an environmentally friendly vehicle Describe this vehicle and its environmentally friendly feature 56
- Today people are living longer, so they should work longer. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes ( in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The maps show how the town of Harborne changed from 1936 to 2007. 67
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he flower shop, a bank and the library. In the northwest of the town, there were t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51776649746 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36202662563 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467005076142 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2100720778 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280498196406 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130024875005 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114360304524 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224283564874 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119764655752 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.