The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the two maps delineating the developments of a university campus from 2010 to the present day.
Perceptibly, the campus has experienced drastic modifications with much more student accommodation and facilities than previously.
The blooming of student accommodation buildings has leaped in amount and size. To the west of campus, there was a student hall building which has been extended. Furthermore, a replacement of some shops and the restaurant with a second student building as well as the new road to the east of campus. The lake, meanwhile, has remained and is still the central point of the campus as well as more lawn and seating areas have been removed.
Further south of the lake, previous whereabouts have been blocked down to give way to a new building for student facilities, which includes shops offices and so on. Head north, additional development is that the arts and science teaching blocks are now separated. In addition, the building which contained the university office has been turned into the science block and the main teaching block was re-shaped into the arts block.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-11 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | kamelelahe | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-30 | trasher kubarev | view | |
| 2021-09-06 | viviene | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The graphs show changes in the trends of the urban and rural population and by different age groups from 1950 to 2040 67
- The line graph shows the global demand for different textile fibers between 1980 and 2015 Units are measured in million tonnes 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating the developmen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, so, still, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12154696133 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87164229616 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.934019788 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145199974021 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654041686511 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703936995051 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106111535233 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828835037825 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.