The chart below gives information about southland's main exports in 2000, *2021, and future projections for 2025.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the bar chart contrasting total money of three main exports in Southland, namely international tourism, dairy products, meat products over 21-year period, commencing from 2000 to 2021 as well as giving a prediction in 2025.
Perceptibly, total money from export products in 21 years have leaped from international tourism and dairy products while the opposite has been true for meat products, and it is likely to still have a similar trend in 2025. Furthermore, total money from international tourism exports is projected to continue accounting for the highest over the years.
Total value of international tourism and dairy products were 8 and 7 billion respectively in 200, and these figures leaped sharply to 9 and 10 billions in order in 2021. While the meat products group, this slight nudge in this figure from 6 billions in 2000 to 5.5 billions in 2021.
Likewise, in 2025. International tourism is likely to rank first of total money from export products with 9.8 billions, meanwhile the second highest of this figure seems to be dairy product with 9,5 billions, followed by 5 billions of meat products.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The line graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007 in grams 89
- The graphs show changes in the trends of the urban and rural population and by different age groups from 1950 to 2040 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concert between 2010 and 2015
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 billion'.
Suggestion: 5 billion
... product with 9,5 billions, followed by 5 billions of meat products.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, likewise, second, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07567567568 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80313921905 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52972972973 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3674008685 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.142857143 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114425447924 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701941563929 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548137633728 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860050921301 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631933587519 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.