One government’s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts event in the same years
The pie charts give information about the goverment’s expenditure on culture and education along one decade from 1995 to 2005 whilst the bar chart provides the number of people participating in arts events in the same decade. There are three art categories will be figured out specifically visual arts, theatre, music, and literature. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive movement expense progression had to be in theatre category whilst the music events participants happened to be the most sharply increased trend along the decade.
Regarding to the first chart initially, the most climbed expense was invested in theatre events which the proportion started from fifth of the chart in 1995 and went up to as much as 15% higher in 2005 closely. Then it followed by literature funds which firstly noted at around a tenth of the chart and got 5% bigger in the end of the decade. Reversely, investment in music events happened to be decreased which marked from nearly a half of the chart in early decade and got 10% lower in 2005 approximately. Similarly, visual arts spending was went down from a quarter of the chart and decline was exactly the same with the former event category
Looking at the second chart, music events participants occurred to be the most increased amount of the visitors which stood up to 25.000 higher along the decade nearly. Same case as in theatre and literature participants which both participants rose up to 10.000 higher estimably. Contrastingly, visual arts participants had to be the only one category which the amount dropped down around 1.000 participants over the decade respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-02 | ribimultisona | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | ribimultisona | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that children leisure activities must be educational; otherwise they are complete waste of time 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- Housing and accommodation has become a major problem in many countries around the world What are some of the main factors that have contributed to this problem What can be done to help reducing the number of homeless people 84
- Average Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal, between 1967 to 2007 73
- the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the same with the former event category Looking at the second chart, music event...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, regarding, second, similarly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05904059041 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83869144899 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505535055351 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6495471732 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.333333333 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255471111688 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113476735627 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115982309539 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176830893713 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671503049737 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.