One government’s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts event in the same years
The pie charts give information about the goverment’s expenditure on culture and education along one decade from 1995 to 2005 whilst the bar chart provides the number of people participating in arts events in the same decade. There are three art categories will be figured out specifically visual arts, theatre, music, and literature. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive movement expense progression had to be in music category whilst the most declined was in literature funds estimably. The music events participants happened to be the most sharply increased trend along the decade.
Regarding to the first chart initially, the most climbed expense was invested in music events which the proportion started from one tenth of the chart in 1995 and went up to as much as a quarter of the chart in 2005 closely. Then it followed by theatre funds which firstly noted at around a fifth of the chart and got 15% bigger in the end of decade. Reversely, investment in literature events happened to be the most decreased peak which marked from nearly a half of chart in early decade and got three times lower in 2005. Similarly, visual arts spending was went down from a quarter chart to 10% smaller approximately in the last year of the decade.
Looking at the second chart, music events participants occurred to be the most increased amount of the visitors which stood up to 25.000 higher along the decade nearly. Same case as in theatre and literature participants which both participants rose up to 10.000 higher estimably. Contrastingly, visual arts participants had to be the only one category which the amount dropped down around 1.000 participants over the decade respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-02 | ribimultisona | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | ribimultisona | 67 | view |
- Average Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal, between 1967 to 2007 73
- UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
- British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to english in 2000 and 2010 67
- One government’s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts event in the same years 73
- US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, regarding, second, similarly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02836879433 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83093348512 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 283.868780488 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9837563015 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.909090909 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25111282413 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101059761314 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10904319015 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169332772916 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589399500252 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.