Online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013
The pie charts compare online sales for retail sectors in various types of categories over a period of a decade in New Zealand.
It is clear that sales for books and film or music sectors increased between 2003 and 2013. By contrast, it is interesting to note that the ratio for travel and clothes sales decreased over the same period shown.
Looking at the pie charts in more detail, the sales ratio of books and film or music(entertainment) used by people stood at 19% and 21 %, accordingly in 2003. The ratio for the entertainment sector increased sharply ranging from 21% to 33% which successfully reached the highest sales in 2013. Nevertheless, the book sector experienced a slight increase and reached 22% over the surveyed year?
It could be explained by the fact that the level of travel sales accounted for 36% of the total sector which was 12% higher than the travel sector in 2003 experienced approximately the same decrease only 1 % difference and reached 29 and 16 respectively in 2013.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Hoàng Minh Hoàng | view | |
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | view | |
| 2023-01-15 | xuanmailonton | view |
- An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries What problems does this cause What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation 84
- The percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 73
- The international community should take action to ensure that all countries reduce the consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 56
- Some businesses face problems with new employees who just finished their education and lack some interpersonal skills such as the ability to work in a team What do you think is the main cause of the problem How can it be resolved 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nly 1 % difference and reached 29 and 16 respectively in 2013.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, look, nevertheless
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88304093567 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82413572457 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5293167816 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44589520108 0.215688989381 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202581493723 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128356589761 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278624487133 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931960077388 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.