People Participate in IELTS Program in six ENglish Courses in Pare, 2016
The table shows information about the number of student attending ielts program in six diffferent courses in Pare, 2016. In general, it is clear that ge and es are two most popular place to learn ielts programs, while webster and warung ielts are on two bottom of the list.
Regarding ielts reading and listening programs,ge and es had the highest number of class participant, which are above 157s students. Followed by test and Elfast. On the bottom of the list are webster and warung ielts range from 144 to 155 participants.
Moving on writing task 1 program, there are slightly different order of the list, which is es ranked first (157( and ge listed in second place (155). Subsequently, warung ielts and Websterare on the two bottom order.
In contrast, on the writing task 2 program, webster and warung ielts ranked first and second with 157 and 155 participant respectively. Contrary, test, ge and es were three less popular courses on this program.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-10 | lhm.ils | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Arman Mansyur | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Jesslynindah | 42 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Arman Mansyur | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Arman Mansyur | 84 | view |
- the three maps shows changes in the village of Kelsbey from 1780 to 2000. 73
- Task 2: Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- In many countries, children are becoming overweight and unhealthy. Some people think that the government should have the responsibility. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 78
- The graph and table below show the changes in the number of overseas visitors and top 5 visitor countries to Britain in 2004 and 2005. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bottom' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'bottoms'.
Suggestion: bottoms
...ile webster and warung ielts are on two bottom of the list. Regarding ielts readin...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ge
...ing ielts reading and listening programs,ge and es had the highest number of class ...
^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'program' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'programs'.
Suggestion: programs
.... In contrast, on the writing task 2 program, webster and warung ielts ranked first ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90797546012 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59604182825 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564417177914 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8580815728 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244793128422 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102507865993 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103704466242 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153117842203 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926749898269 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.