There is a table chart gives information on the change in the number of educational research over 20 years about the reason why many mature generations’s UK take part in arts occasion.
It is clear that the largest reason has chose is desire to see specific artist and on the another aspect, the most rare is for business.
Out of the four excuses, attendant decide on the desire to see specific artist is surely reaches its peak and quite stabilize over the 20 years period with the highest figures is 58% and now is 56%. With the selection for work, there is slight growth from 6% to 10% within 10 years and reach 11% 10 years later. It can be seen that this choice is unpopular. In comparison with the reason for seeing specific artist, for work is 5 times less.
Accompanying children go up significantly over the years, 9% at 20 years ago and reach 24% today, approximate triple higher than before. Opposition is the selection for special occasion with a non-stop slum during the time. Achieved the highest point at 27% 20 years past and starting decline to 20% in recent 10 years and drop remains 9% now
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...It is clear that the largest reason has chose is desire to see specific artist and on...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... seen that this choice is unpopular. In comparison with the reason for seeing specific art...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ific artist, for work is 5 times less. Accompanying children go up significantl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56249878049 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5668244118 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0696157747557 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288532203398 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347456909318 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506241547678 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343980308871 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.