Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals.
The charts illustrate the percentage of ,how much budget spent on different meals from 1970 to 2000.
Having a look on restaurant meals, 90% total food budget spent on home made food. The amount spent on restaurant meals inclined to 15% in 1980 but it reached with 20% over the time period of ten decades. Finally, in 2000 an average family spent half of the total budget on restaurant meals.
Moving to the other chart into consideration, in the initial years, there was a equal numbers of people having fast food meals as well as sit down restaurant meals about 20 meals per year whereas, the popularity of sit down restaurant meals upsurged near around 30 meals in 1980.Interestingly , fast food meals touched the peak point on 80 meals however, sit down restaurant meals stabled just above the initial stage .
Overall, more money expenditure on the restaurant meals and fast food was very popular over the time period.
- The Chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. 56
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 56
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals. 78
- It is generally believed that education is of vital importance to the development of individuals and the well being of societies What should education consist of to fulfil both these functions 75
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditure for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year of 2009. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
The charts illustrate the percentage of ,how much budget spent on different meals...
^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ration, in the initial years, there was a equal numbers of people having fast foo...
^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Interestingly
...s upsurged near around 30 meals in 1980.Interestingly , fast food meals touched the peak poin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ar around 30 meals in 1980.Interestingly , fast food meals touched the peak point ...
^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...als stabled just above the initial stage . Overall, more money expenditure on the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85443037975 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60227514639 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 119.92045975 43.030603864 279% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367330591474 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235274121928 0.103423049105 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14687828142 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234225252151 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155446323856 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.