Percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
The given six pie charts represent the consumption of water percentagewise in major parts of the world across three sectors, namelly industrial, agriculture, and domestic.
Overall, it is clear that water usage for agriculture purpose is the highest proportion in Asia and Africa while in North America and Europe the focus is towards industrial segment. The minor usage of water was in domestic sector.
To begin with, majority of the water was required in the agriculture segment and this was higher in Africa and Asia regions than that of American and European parts. More than 80% water in Africa and Asia was consumed in agricultural fields while it was only 32% and 39% in Europe and North America respectively.
Meanwhile, North America and Europe requirement was different than Africa and Asia, with approximately half portion of their water resources goes into industrial segment compared to the figures in Africa and Asia where it ranged from 5% to 12%. Finally, more water is used in America and Europe for household than in Asia and Africa.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, 56
- Percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ca and Europe requirement was different than Africa and Asia, with approximately hal...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11494252874 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69929014024 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4258241123 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175746098914 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947072455827 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507187582577 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113494437744 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394851334926 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.