The pie chart below sho the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The two pie charts illustrate the household expenditures on six major categories in a country during the years 1950 and 2010.
Overall, the greatest percentage in 1950 was for housing. And the worst percentage was health care. While in 2010, the greatest percentage was for food and the worst percentage was health care.
According to the pie chart, in 1950 expenditures spent the largest proportion on housing was 72,1% and drastically declined in the 2010 which was 22,00%. The difference in 2010, expenditures spent the largest proportion on for food was 34,0% it had increase from 11,2% in 1950. Moreover, health care was the worst category representing 2,4% in 1950 was increase to 4,5% in 2010. Furthermore, the percentage of education was 6,6% in the 1950 and then, it had decrease to 6,3% in 2010. The difference about transportation in the 1950 at 3,3% and it had increase tp 14,0% in 2010. The same case with other in the 1950 was 4,4% and it had increase to 19,2% in 2010.
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies. 67
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages ? 56
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 67
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweight than the disadvantages ? 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, then, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82352941176 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77330327816 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452941176471 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0122556419 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263547539586 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13356476657 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112676735934 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23244763972 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156000710113 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.