The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart illustrates the major causes that affected agricultural lands in the world to become less productive. While the table compares three different world regions; North America, Europe, and Oceania and how the acts of deforestation, over-cultivation, and over-grazing contributed to land degradation.
The most significant cause that had impact on land becoming less productive is the act of over-grazing accounting to 35%. The second cause is over-cultivation at approximetly 30%. Deforestation had a similar percentage at around 28%. Finally, other causes contributing to land degradation for only 7%.
Regarding the figures in the table, deforestation percentage in North America was the lowest among the other regions at around 0.2%. While Europe, and Oceania percentages were 9.8 and 1.7 respectively. Surprisingly, over-cultivation had a zero impact in Oceania. North America had a 3.3% and Europe almost had doubled at around 7.7. Finally, over-grazing, was the highest contributing factor in Oceania at around 11% while North America and Europe had 1.5 for the latter and 5.5 for the former.
Overall, it is clear from the pic chart that the different reasons of land degradation contributed similarly to having less productive agriculture. While the table shows that Europe had the highest percentage of degraded land in 1990.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. 73
- Some people say that the Internet is responsible for destroying the social skills of teenagers and young adults 84
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for theirachievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. 78
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to having less productive agriculture. While the table shows that Europe had the hig...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58252427184 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33520229127 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52427184466 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.9754995935 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202766586639 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896122031429 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114439745266 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156720509218 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113935289212 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.