Some people say that the Internet is responsible for destroying the social skills of teenagers and young adults.
Since its invention, the Internet has changed the way people communicate. Many people argue that it has had a negative influence on the way teenagers and young adults communicate. This essay will present some ideas about why this may be a negative development and suggest how this influence can be reduced.
Although the Internet had developed many aspects of our everyday life, its negative impact on young people is serious. Teenagers, nowadays, are addicted to social media sites and spend most of their time surfing the internet. This behaviour is addictive and is causing many problems such as depression, stress, anxiety, and jealousy that will eventually affect the teenager interaction in real life. Moreover, teens are spending less time with their family and friends and depend on virtual communication to check up on people, ask questions, or even get to know one another. Last but not least, young people may use a persona on the Internet that is different than their personality in real life making them feel less confident to communicate effectively with other people in face-to-face situations.
There are several interventions that can be made to tackle the dangers of the internet over young people. On one hand, parents have an important role to solve this issue by monitoring their young boys and girls. Firstly, they can limit internet access during the week, and turn it off at night. Encouraging their children to play outside and empowering them to do their favourite hobbies, is another thing that families can do to solve this issue. On the other hand, schools can be an important part to solve this matter. Schools can encourage teens to volunteer in the schools’ activities and events and find ways to involve them in community service. Finally, governments can impose laws and regulations on social media companies to force them to specify the allowable time for teens to spend using their applications.
In conclusion, it is clear that the Internet has a big impact on disrupting teenagers social life, however, many solutions and steps could be taken by families, schools, and government to tackle this issue.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- Some people say that the Internet is responsible for destroying the social skills of teenagers and young adults 84
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport. 61
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 661, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...rsona on the Internet that is different than their personality in real life making t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, another thing, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13105413105 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73747221157 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6050375518 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178676625812 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638304745571 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05008293431 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113888207608 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029246938643 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.