The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart gives information about the reasons for the degradation of farming land worldwide while the table illustrates the percentage of land degradation in three regions in the world due to these factors during the 1900s.
Overall, from the pie chart, over-gazing is the leading cause of the worldwide farmland deterioration. According to the table date, the highest percentage of total land degraded among three regions was possessed by Europe.
In the world, the predominant reason for land degradation was over-gazing, accounted for 35%, followed by over-cultivation (28%), while the third position in the pie chart went to deforestation at the proportion of 30%. All minor reasons, known as “other” sector, occupied 7%, being much less than other factors mentioned.
From the table data, strikingly, over-cultivation had no impact in Oceania, while the highest percentage of agriculture land (11.3%) in there becoming less productive was due to over-gazing. Meanwhile, the opposite was true for North America with the figure for the former factor accounting for 3.3%. While deforestation sector contributed the smallest percentage (0.2%) as compared with other reasons in North America, it was the leading cause that led Europe to face to the land degradation problem with 23% of total land degraded.
- People are surrounded by all kinds of advertising Some people believe that advertising has a negative effect on people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
- the graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the uk from 1990 to 2005 84
- The bar chart present the percentage of changing cars in 2009 in an European country. 78
- The charts below show the percentage of school-aged boys and girls in secondary school and higher education in four region in the world in 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53431372549 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14676866294 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9675828623 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.125 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215201699323 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100443530942 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073184497378 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156559948697 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661694306798 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.