The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990.

The given circular chart highlights the erudition about the land degradation by four main reason such as; over- cultivation, overgrazing, deforestation and other ,and the tabular layout the enlightenment about effect of these four cause on three different regions during the time period of 1990. The data is calibrated in per centum.

At the first glance of histogram, it can be seen that, the main factor effecting the farmland is overgrazing(35%). In addition to this, second cause is deforestation, which has been counted for 30% degradation of cultivating land. Furthermore, 28% and 7% of global degradation due to over cultivation and other causes respectively.

After observing the tabular representation, it can be noticed that, these causes effected different regions differently in the 1990, Europe was one of the most effected countrywide 28% of the total land degradation which included, not only over cultivation(7.7%); but also main factor deforestation (9.8%). Apart from all this North America and Oceania both were least effected by these causes.

Overall it is evident that, overgrazing activity is major cause of the land degradation as compare to other three main cause, special in Europe.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... main reason such as; over- cultivation, overgrazing, deforestation and other ,a...
^^
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch as; over- cultivation, overgrazing, deforestation and other ,and the tabular...
^^
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., overgrazing, deforestation and other ,and the tabular layout the enlightenment...
^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is calibrated in per centum. At the first glance of histogram, it can be see...
^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...7.7%; but also main factor deforestation 9.8%. Apart from all this North America ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, apart from, in addition, in fact, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46808510638 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16599748316 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632978723404 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.4357698059 43.030603864 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182769538231 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711470795068 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603272254051 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117323977128 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430525587993 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.