The given circular charts highlight the lowdown about the production of electricity in two European countries:Germany and France from three different sources such as thermal energy, nuclear power, renewable sources.The data is calibrated in per centum.
It can be seen that, in Germany 59.6% of the total electricity was produced by thermal energy. In addition to this, nuclear and renewable sources had been produced 23% and 17.4% of electricity respectively. To add on, in further classification of renewable energy sources, biomass generated 39.3% of electricity, closely followed by wind at 36.9%. Surprisingly, there was no electricity generation by geothermal resources.
As far as the trend was concerned, it can be notified that nuclear power was main source of electricity, which produced 76% of total electricity in France. Apart from this, 10.3% power had been generated by thermal energy meanwhile, 13.7% electricity had produced by renewable sources. Furthermore, the electricity produced by renewable sources like biomass, wind and hydroelectric was 8.1%, 10.5% and 80.5% respectively.
Overall, it is evident that, thermal energy and biomass were two major resources of electricity in Germany whereas nuclear power and hydroelectric energy had considered as main electricity production resources in France.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 81
- the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. summarize the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The digrams below show how glass containers, such as bottles, are products and recycled. 78
- The diagram below show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purpose. 78
- world become global village some think it has many benefits other suggest it has no benefit. discuss both points of view 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce from three different sources such as thermal energy, nuclear power, renewabl...
^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fferent sources such as thermal energy, nuclear power, renewable sources.The dat...
^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ergy, nuclear power, renewable sources.The data is calibrated in per centum. It...
^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y. To add on, in further classification of renewable energy sources, biomass gen...
^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar power was main source of electricity, which produced 76% of total electricity ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, apart from, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79081632653 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2408964867 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5568001668 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.111111111 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177678887973 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862921585264 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262454259887 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121447121758 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257823053652 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.4140731707 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.