The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s
The pie chart illustrates the main factors leading to land degradation on a global scale while the table provides the proportions of land degraded by these causes to three areas during the 1990s.
In general, it can be seen that internationally, over-grazing, deforestation and over-cultivation are the main reasons, indicated by their comparable figures. Also, regionally, Europe had the largest percentage of land degraded.
In details, over-grazing is held responsible for degrading 35% of worldwide land, which is followed by deforestation and over-cultivation ( 30% and 28%, respectively). Other factors only accounted for less than 10 percent.
However, this pattern was not observed for the figures in individual areas. Up to 23% of land in Europe was degraded, which was higher than the figure for Oceania (13%) and North America (5%). In Europe, nearly 10% of land degradation was attributed to deforestation whereas over-cultivation and over-grazing had lesser impacts (accounting for 7.7 percent and 5.5 percent, respectively). In contrast, most of the land degraded in Oceania was because of over-grazing. Deforestation only accounted for 1.7% of degradation while over-cultivation was a non-factor for these islands. However, the latter was the main cause of degradation in the land of North America, accounting for 3.3%, which was more than 2 times the figure for over-grazing while deforestation played a minor role.
- The table below shows expenditures of four companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 73
- In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of a large, extended family. Is this a positive or negative trend? 84
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 82
- Men and women are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples.Write at least 250 words 84
- It has been argued that gift giving should not be encouraged, because money is often wasted on things that people do not like or want.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by deforestation and over-cultivation 30% and 28%, respectively. Other factors...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in fact, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57798165138 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48420993611 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559633027523 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0811012111 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.545454545 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108389222951 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515248276316 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738441177665 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101346566092 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103734310707 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.