The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables provide information about revenues from bananas and coffee for Fair-trade in 5 countries over a 5-year period.
Overall, the most striking feature is coffee revenues increased in all 5 nations, with the UK having the most dramatic climb over the period. Sales for bananas experienced an upward trend, albeit to widely varying degrees, except for Denmark and Sweden which recorded drops in the examined time.
Looking at sales of coffee between 1999 and 2004, the figure for the UK shot up from 1.5 million to 20 million pounds. A less pronounced increase was witnessed in the figure for Switzerland, which doubled to reach 6 million pounds in 2004. In comparison, coffee revenues in Belgium rose by only 0.7 million pounds, which still more than tripled the increment found in Denmark (1.8 - 2 million euros) and Sweden (0.8 - 1 million euros).
Turning to the revenue of bananas in the same period, it is Switzerland which stands out for soaring from 15 million to 47 million euros. Also, the UK and Belgium sales figures both underwent manifold growth (by almost 6 times to hit 5.5 million euros and by around 7 times to reach 4 million euros, respectively). By contrast, banana sales in both Sweden and Denmark followed a different pattern, experiencing noticeable reductions (by 0.8 million euros and 1.1 million euros).
- Today food travels from thousands of miles from the farm to the consumer. Some people say that it would be better for the economy & environment if people ate food produced from local farmers.Would the advantages of this idea outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas. 84
- The table and pie chart shows the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, still, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05855855856 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60098572734 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.2064168617 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131988911165 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681948723146 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575957730819 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103092019483 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583927637303 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.