The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and ma

The given pie chart illustrates the main causes which reduction of lad productivity, while the table depicts three regions which was affected by mentioned reasons in the 1990.

Overall, there are three main poses in which contributed to degradation. Over-grazing, deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing the dominant reason. Among the North America, Europe and Oceania Europe was mentioned more affected region.

From the pie chart, 35% of land degradation attributed to over-grazing, while 30 and 28% of land become less productive by virtue of deforestation and over-cultivation, respectively. Other reasons caused about 7 percent of this matter.
In terms of region, Europe was the most high rank of degraded land with its 23 percent share. Interestingly deforestation was the main cause for it. The second suffered lands was in Oceania and its allocation was approximately 13 percent. In Oceania, agricultural lands lost more its effectivity by over-grazing (13%). Finally, North America pointed more positive place in this rank, over 5 percent of its land was degraded principally by over-cultivation.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se for it. The second suffered lands was in Oceania and its allocation was approx...
^^
Line 6, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...graded principally by over-cultivation.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68452380952 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46053532061 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613095238095 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7305608019 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8181818182 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178775486662 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780050496986 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568951313551 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133603561167 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562159988265 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.07 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.