The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The pie chart illustrates, the lower rate of farm production by the effect of over grazing, excessive cultivation, deforestation and other. While the table demonstrates, the percentage of degradation in North America, Europe and Oceania by such reasons.
Overall, it is clear from the chart, the most significant cause of degradation was over grazing and the least causative factor was other reasons. However, Europe was the noticeable region which affect the degradation predominantly among the other region.
As is observed in the pie chart, the highest amount of worldwide land degradation caused by over grazing with 35%. The second reason was by deforestation which is about 30% globally. Similarly, over cultivation and other factors consist of about 28% and 7% respectively.
In 1990, 23% of total land deterioration happened in Europe which is about 9.8% (deforestation), 7.7% (over cultivation) and 5.5% ( over grazing). In turns of Oceania, the main factor was over grazing which is about 11.3% out of 13%. Whilst, in North America, account for least amount of land degradation and over cultivation was the top with 3.3% in total of 5%. Moreover, no more land degraded by over cultivation in Oceania.
- more money should be poured into teaching science rather than other subjects do you agree or disagree 89
- The graphs show the changes in spending habits of people in UK betweeon 1971 ans 2001 Write a report to a university lecture and descr8be the data 81
- The protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world 84
- Directors of large companies receive much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people think it s necessary but others holds it is unfair Discuss both perspectives and give your opinion 73
- The graphs show enrolment in different colleges in the Higher Colleges of Technology in 1999.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estation, 7.7% over cultivation and 5.5% over grazing. In turns of Oceania, the m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40932642487 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00553866019 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523316062176 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7753681232 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9090909091 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0907974093611 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422473655645 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281530789536 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640570973157 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130695810896 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.