The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often considered by some government that, national enhancement and growth seems to be carried out by teaching subject like science rather than other academic syllabus. However, in this essay disagree with the statement because a countries development could be achieved not only by learning science but also remaining subjects like maths, history, arts and so on.
Initially, progress of a country include neither scientific nor cultural, social, geographical. In brief, government should preserve money for arts, sports, and mathematical subjects as well, which may gave an outcome with sustainable and reliable manner. For instance, irrespective of mathematical subject budget would lead to economical and financial decline to the core. Similarly, students who have loss of knowledge regarding social and geographical subjects also diminish the well being and relation with neighboring countries. Moreover, lack of expense for the survival of arts and linguistic subjects would lead to detrimental effect on overall sustainability of a nation.
Not to be outdone, science subjects may interconnected with other academic syllabus such as, many scientific calculation and remarks are contributed to maths and social structures. Demanding more money for science may alter the exact outcome of fewer scientific researches to some extent. Owing to the fact that, getting more allowance for science subjects may change the teachers and students attitudes towards studies and projects which would impact in countries development. For example, extra payment for science would lead to rush in like subject, and thereby mitigate the alternate subjects and may lead to unemployment and poverty to the core.
To sum up, government must distribute money for every subjects rather consider certain subject preference. National development attributed by many factors and donations from various subjects which is inevitable for students academia and countries well being.
- Many people think that museums will be replaced by technology as most information can be found free online Others believe that museums are still important Will museums no longer be needed in the future Is this a positive development 62
- The chart below gives information on the numbers of workers in different occupations who migrated to Australia between 2009 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- animals are in danger extinction some people said that we should protect those animals which are useful to humans to what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the Alcohol related deaths in 7 different countries and the average beer consumption in 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the description of the correlation of the table that follows 68
- The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperatures for Auckland and Christchurch two cities in New Zealand and London and Edinburgh two cities in the United Kingdom 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...y disagree with the statement because a countries development could be achieved not only ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, well, for example, for instance, in brief, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75342465753 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92944172555 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592465753425 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.070004788 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.230769231 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31202503397 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112264439104 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442774512486 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190923182783 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243264556239 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.