The pie chart below shows the results of survey in which undergraduates and postgraduates were asked about the range of books and non print material in their school library Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co

Essay topics:

The pie chart below shows the results of survey, in which undergraduates and postgraduates were asked about the range of books and non-print material in their school library.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The pie chart below compares the outcome of an observation, in which measured the level of satisfaction of the range of books and non-print material in the school library by both undergraduates and postgraduates.

It is clearly seen that a great postgraduates deemed that it was not good referring to both range of books and non-print material. Meanwhile, both of them were considered to be very good to undergraduates.

As for range of books, 50 percent of postgraduates found them not good, on the contrary, the percentage of undergraduates believing that the library provided a wide variety of books was 28 percent. The percentage of undergraduates satisfied with the wide diversity of books was 37 percent, followed by 35 percent of undergraduates who were satisfied. Postgraduates were of the opinion that they were very satisfied with the range of books accounted for 22 percent, compared to 28 percent of satisfied people.

The most common opinion as to non-print material was not good by postgraduates (62%) and very good by undergraduates (68%). The number of graduates and postgraduates satisfied with material that was not printed was 20% and 22% respectively. Finally, 12 percent of undergraduates found non-print material not good, while only 16 percent of postgraduates considered non-print material very good.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (18 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-10-03 12345-6789 87 view
2021-10-03 12345-6789 61 view
2019-11-29 Kuwinder singh 44 view
2018-06-26 Rapunzel 71 view
2017-07-01 lauranguyen 63 view
Essays by user lauranguyen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below compares the outcome of an observ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...both undergraduates and postgraduates. It is clearly seen that a great postgrad...
^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'postgraduate'?
Suggestion: postgraduate
...es. It is clearly seen that a great postgraduates deemed that it was not good referring t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to be very good to undergraduates. As for range of books, 50 percent of pos...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red to 28 percent of satisfied people. The most common opinion as to non-print ...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsidered non-print material very good.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, while, as for, as to, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40952380952 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39466033954 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447619047619 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7439334605 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.222222222 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257180083446 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130429150729 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723400476959 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18517758705 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723801948982 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.