the pie chart shows an average expenditure of Canadian household in 1972 and 2002.
The pie chart compares the average yearly expenditure on different household items and food by the Canadian people in the year 1972 and 2002 - over a gap of 30 years - measured in percentage.
Over the period of 3 decades since 1972, an enormous discrepancy had observed in the investment of cars and foods whereas other item expenses varied but on the smaller scales.
In detail, in the fall of 1972, approximately 40% of share consumed by food where after 30 years, this share dipped by 25% and ended at 14%, in the year 2002. Meanwhile, second most enormous discrepancy found in cars expenditure, where reversely, car expense rose by 75% and in 2002, ended at 40%. For petrol expenditure, it remained stable over a time span, which was 10%.
For the rest of the least variated expenditures, monetary share for the restaurant had increased from 8% in fall 1972 to 14% in fall 2002. Eventually, significant change also observed in this - restaurant - as well. Alongside, the investment on furniture and books become less popular among the Canadian people, as in this both item expenses had significant dropped and ended at 9% and 3% ,respectively. However, computer expenses turned to three-fold in the year 2002, which was also noticeable variation.
- the pie chart shows an average expenditure of Canadian household in 1972 and 2002 82
- Many people believe that government should have to pay for education and health service. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 73
- nowadays people prefer to shop in large supermarkets rather than nearby local shops why do you think this happens is this a positive or negative try and give your opinion and example from your own experience 62
- Comparison between the Japanese tourist numbers in between 1985 and 1995. 78
- Development of an island for tourism purposes. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 389, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gnificant dropped and ended at 9% and 3% ,respectively. However, computer expenses...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'whereas', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26 0.268076937826 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.088 0.116061578633 76% => OK
Adjectives: 0.084 0.0759168565197 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.044 0.0366838410393 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.004 0.0131127313244 31% => OK
Prepositions: 0.16 0.155750635184 103% => OK
Participles: 0.02 0.0379272487307 53% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85408170213 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.008 0.0210936926555 38% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.088 0.0948980150116 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.016 0.00967000014798 165% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1257.0 1161.00487805 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.9 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9014084507 5.90752243213 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73763899035 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.305164319249 0.337110787985 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24882629108 0.247514529752 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201877934272 0.171178102325 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.1220657277 0.112407865282 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85408170213 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582159624413 0.546246751206 107% => OK
Word variations: 55.7668885417 49.3433353143 113% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6666666667 23.0094962315 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2789093147 42.9750493124 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 135.714022679 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 23.0094962315 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 48.5492957746 47.7609492067 102% => OK
Elegance: 3.23529411765 2.94281807926 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482216205856 0.418131533498 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.153804264388 0.181151798455 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0851632147856 0.0850326197045 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.641269389267 0.706616315825 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.238174897807 0.157042692854 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202940084318 0.228904883108 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141380425105 0.108899403657 130% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.307923183367 0.367819155151 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0588052476194 0.0812612215331 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333117141959 0.316326947829 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118348794877 0.0921553760075 128% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.08536585366 98% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.02926829268 132% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.