The pie charts and the table show the types of living accommodation occupied by 25-year-olds in London during yhr 1990s and 2010s and the availability of different types of accommodation in London during the same two periods.
The given pie charts illustrate 2 surveys regarding the living accommodation of 25-year-olds in London during the years 1990 and 2010 as for the living status (alone or shared in a house, flat, or with parents). The provided table illustrates the available housing from 1990 to 2010 onwards, these are measured as 1-2 and 3-4-bedroom houses or flats. Overall, it can be clearly seen that for 25-year-olds in London, the 1990's and 2010's showed that more of them preferred to live in flat-sharing and house-sharing. In terms of the available housing, both the 1990's and 2010's presented that more people lived in 3-4-bedroom houses.
First of all, there was a big difference between living with family and staying in shared house and flat during the 2010s, to be more specify, the former proportion accounted for much less percentage than the latter. Although, a considerable deep in available housing was shown at 1-2-bedroom houses and 1-2 bedrooms flat, the percentage of young adults living with their parents have decreased dramatically. On the other hand, while house-sharing and flat-sharing became popular in the 2010s, both single flat and house went down gradually in popularity.
According to the table, it is worth of note that a big change occurred in the number of 1-2-bedroom house and flat in 2010 onwards, with the figure being significantly lower than the 1990s’ by 22.000 houses/ flats. Conversely, the number of 3-4-bedroom house and flat have increased slightly to 48,500 and 32,000 respectively.
- Children watch too much television nowadays and this is bad for their education and development How far do you agree with this statement 95
- young people should spend more time on cultural activities such as music and theatre and less time on sport. how far do you agree with this statement? 73
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 88
- What are advantages and disadvantages of watching TV 97
- Do the advantages of having closed circuit television outweigh the disadvantages 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, regarding, while, as for, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22357723577 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92139287344 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.2633307424 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.777777778 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192716582108 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094021520703 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983040926627 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134726870572 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13365236366 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.