The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts (GW) in 2015 with the predictions for 2040.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar charts depict a comparison regarding how much various sources constituted total energy capacity in 2015 and projected data for 2040.
The most salient feature of the two charts is that despite an expected decline in fossil fuels’ share and an opposite trend for wind and solar, fossil fuels would still remain the primary source of energy for both years.
In 2015, almost two-thirds of energy in the 6.688 total capacity was produced from fossil fuels (64%), followed by other renewables, accounting for 23%. Nuclear, wind and solar stood at third, fourth and fifth positions, with 6%, 5% and 2% respectively.
Overall capacity is anticipated to double to 11.678 GW in 2040, where fossil fuels’ share is expected to reduce by 20% to 44% whilst still remaining highest. Other renewables again will come in second with a minor decrease to 21%. Significant changes are to be seen in solar and wind energy, which will increase ninefold to 18% and twofold to 12% respectively, while the proportion of nuclear power will witness marginal downswing to 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-07 | Andrew Chen | 73 | view |
- Some people prefer to provide help and support directly to those in need Others however prefer to give money to national and international charitable organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 67
- There are a lot of positives and negatives about using public transport Discuss both sides 78
- The power of modern devices lies in their ability to allow us to connect but at the same time disconnect with each other We now have more relationships online but at the same time less relationships offline In your opinion does technology bring us closer 78
- Sports which depend on violence for entertainment such as wrestling or boxing have no place in a civilized society and should be banned To what extend do you support or reject this idea 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56727659026 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670454545455 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4033792119 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192771186009 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840816783137 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591626629679 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121331940759 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484494757646 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.