The pie charts illustrate the percentage of capacity of energy in gigawatts in 2015 with the forecasts for 2040.
On the whole, power storage will grow to almost 5000 gigawatts over the quarter of a century. Moreover, fossil fuels have made up the biggest proportion for the period between 2015 and 2040. In the beginning, solar energy had the least reserves, but it will be replaced by nuclear energy at the end of the period.
The source of energy would mainly endure fossil fuels, however, it will plummet by 20% over the years from approximately two-thirds to well under a half. With this in mind, fossil fuels are limited and they generate a considerable amount of pollution. In addition, nuclear and other renewables will shrink slightly.
Furthermore, the solar and wind sources from 2015 to 2040 will have a phenomenal upturn, with ninefold and over double respectively. That is to say, it is estimated that renewable power like solar and wind will have a notable improvement in the future.
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the Europe spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is inevitable that as technology develops traditional cultures must be lost Technology and tradition are incompatible You cannot have both together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, third, well, in addition, on the whole, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97633136095 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66478552512 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591715976331 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.549270186 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5555555556 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186357240566 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841495714097 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10965612816 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150600800369 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132612534838 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.