The pie charts below indicate the primary uses of the internet in Japan in the years 1995 and 2005.
The pie charts compare the five main reasons for internet use in Japan in two different years, 1995 and 2005.
Overall, while the percentage of internet use for work and study increased in 2005, it both decreased for communication and entertainment. It is also noticeable that work remained the major reason for internet usage after 10 years.
In 1995, the proportion of people who use the internet for work in Japan was the highest among the other purposes at 31% and rose significantly by 14% to 45% in 2005. Similarly, the figure for people who used the internet for studying went up from over a quarter to 30% over a decade.
In terms of communication, the percentage declined slightly from around a fifth in 1995 to just over a tenth in 2005. The figure for entertainment had a more significant reduction from nearly a quarter in
1995 to end with almost the same proportion as communication in 2005 with 13%.
- Some people think that not all criminals should be kept in prison. Some criminals should do unpaid work to help other people in the community. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 73
- The charts below show the primary purposes for British people leaving their country in 1999 and the amount of those people who left the country for less than a week. 67
- The pie charts below indicate the primary uses of the internet in Japan in the years 1995 and 2005. 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- The charts below show the primary purposes for British people leaving their country in 1999 and the amount of those people who left the country for less than a week. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icant reduction from nearly a quarter in 1995 to end with almost the same proport...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78125 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85043171072 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7947603772 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265338746408 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14081605619 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108348657247 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16561112817 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112779563987 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.