The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The pie charts depict the percentage of household spending in a country in 1950 and 2010. In general, each chart is separated into 6 categories. It is easy to see that there are 2 notable shifts in the 2 charts including the decline in the housing expenditure and the increase in the food and other expenditure.
To begin with, in 1950, housing expenditure ranked first with a staggering number of 72,1%, followed by food spending made up only 11,2 %. However, in 2010, there was a sudden dive in the expenditure on housing (at 22%). Furthermore, it is evident that food expenditure received a surge at 34% ( 3 times more than that in 1950).
Moreover, the spending on transportation in 1950 was quite low at only 3,3% but in 2010 this figure started to rise to 14% which was 4 times more than that in the past. Not only transportation but also the expenditure on health care was doubled in 2010 at 4,5%. Spending on education received a slight decrease from 6.6% to 6,3% in 2010. The remaining had a surge in 2010 at 19,2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | Mostakima Tawrin | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | quytnee | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...food expenditure received a surge at 34% 3 times more than that in 1950. Moreove...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54891304348 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76097187026 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286067586986 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124996630552 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115154206535 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208143035023 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974252455553 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.