The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010
The pie charts illustrate information about the percentage of household expenditures in country between 1950 and 2010. The data are shown in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that housing was the highest household expenditures, while in 2010 food became the highest. There was a dramatic increase in the expenditures on food, health care, transportation, and other household expenditures throughout the period, whereas housing and education were continued to decrease.
In 1950, the largest proportion of household expenditures was housing with 72.1% and then fell sharply to 22.0% in 2010. Similarly, the education was 6.6% before it declined slightly to 6.3% by the end of the period.
Regarding the data from the remaining expenditures, food was the second greatest proportion of household (around 11.2%) in 1950. Towards the end of the period, there was a dramatic growth in the food expenditures to approximately 34.0%. Lastly, health care, transportation, and other expenditures started at below 5% before it rose dramatically to above 4.5% by the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | Mostakima Tawrin | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | quytnee | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 73
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 78
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
lastly, regarding, second, similarly, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46428571429 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18233124342 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7425974808 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290074040964 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12460943759 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136807004746 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198668553426 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821511732551 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.