The pie charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate how distinctively individuals in 3 nations studied English in 2010 and 2015
Overall, it can be observed that going to English class in the evening were most advocated contemporarily. Also, there was no cases of studying abroad in country C untill 2015
In 2010, the most favourite options of learning English was going to evening class. Specifically, its proportion account most of each charts with around 70% in country A and B, and remarkably with 94% in country C. Besides, studying abroad is another option that attacted quiet a host of citizens except those in country C, where abroad learning still not even exist. Otherwise, online classes were the least popular decision in 2010, with the percentages around 5 to 8%.
After a 5-year period, although there were some certain shifts in the method of studying English, evening class was still evaluated as the most renowned way. Noticeably, the abroad method was finally introduced to country C in 2015, but account only 3% in comparision with country A and B, which are nearly 8 times as much as that. While the ratio of studying English online increased significantly to 32% in country B, which is 4 times higher than that in 2010
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 73
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 77
- In the past people store knowledge in the books Nowadays people store knowledge on the Internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on Earth Some people think more money should be spent researching other planets such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The bar chart below shows the number of visitors to four London museums Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nations studied English in 2010 and 2015 Overall, it can be observed that going t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to still'
Suggestion: to still
...ose in country C, where abroad learning still not even exist. Otherwise, online class...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.961352657 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71622197063 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1031053794 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.375 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186508406661 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875403517516 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457247288102 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136245555782 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591163617735 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.