The following pie chats compare various ways adopted over the to deal with hazardous waste material in Republic of Korea, Sweden and United Kingdom respectively.
To start with best management of waste products, among all 3 countries, Republic of Korea has the most effective way of disposing its waste by recycling 69% of it. 22% is then land filled while 9% is incinerated. Sweden stands on second spot as 25% of its wastage is recycled while 55%of it is dumped underground and the rest is destroyed with fire. Although, UK has the more number of methods to deal with its trash still there are points to be concerned. It still depends upon the orthodox methods of waste management as 82% of its scrap is still earth filled, 8%.is chemically treated and rest is dumped in sea and incinerated.
In the end, I would sum up by pointing out that earth fill is the most prominent and favourite way of destroying the waste and incineration is the least preferable.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate what problems does it cause how can we save these problems 76
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The environment problem facing today s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation Government and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment To what ex 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the best'.
Suggestion: with the best
...United Kingdom respectively To start with best management of waste products among all ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, still, then, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61291896574 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60119047619 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 168.0 22.4926829268 747% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 777.0 112.824112599 689% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 168.0 22.9334400587 733% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 41.0 5.23603664747 783% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101261306803 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101261306803 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0644052127007 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266600656864 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 84.4 13.2329268293 638% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -82.12 61.2550243902 -134% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 66.4 10.3012195122 645% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.76 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.26 8.06136585366 189% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 69.2 10.9970731707 629% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 54.0 11.0658536585 488% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.