The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
The graphs compare the ways in which harmful garbage is treated among three nations, namely Korea, Sweden and the UK.
Looking at the graphs, it is immediately obvious that the UK has the most various methods in the hazardous waste treatment. In Sweden and the UK, the most famous way to solve this problem is to bury waste below the Earth, while in Korea, recycling is the most preferable method.
In the UK, burying underground registers the highest proportion of dangerous waste disposal. It makes up the biggest part with 82%, compares with 12 % made up together by disposing waste by fire, by chemicals and dumping at sea, with 2%, 8%, 8% respectively. Not making as much as in the UK, in Sweden, burying below the Earth makes up smaller percentage with 55%, while recycling and incineration take significant proportion with 25% and 20%.
Unlike the UK, where recycling is not taken as a way of harzardous waste treatment, it is the most popular method in Korea. Reusing dangerous harmful garbage after appropriate treatment accounts for 69% of waste treatment, compares with 9% for incineration and 22% for burying below the Earth.
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today. What are the causes of Global warming and what measures can government and individuals take to tackle the issue? 84
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 11
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 56
- table agr group rode bicycles in 2011 73
- many people disagree with a school policy which forces children to learn new languages. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ignificant proportion with 25% and 20%. Unlike the UK, where recycling is not ta...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on and 22% for burying below the Earth.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94791666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68198660744 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567708333333 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5864728381 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172276766923 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807916761053 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338602585279 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993745577425 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046888388148 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.