The given pie charts show the total of electricity production measured by unit and divided by different sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
According to the chart, in 1980 and 2000, the proportion of fuel sources in Australia changes significantly. Coal is the most widely used source in both years, accounting for a half in 1980 and in 2000, the number has increased 80%. Similar to coal, hydro power has increased appreciably, from 20% in 1980 to 36% in 2000. However, after two decades, the ratio of oil and natural gas was reduced greatly to only 2% in 2000, compared to 10% and 20% in 1980.
In France, the division in use of fuel sources also has a big change. As a source that hasn’t been focused on in Australia, nuclear power seems to be more popular in this country, which gains 15% of the whole in 1980. This figure has raised up to 126% in 2000, becoming the major material in the electric industry. Coal and oil occupied approximately the same ratio (at one forth of the total) in 1980, then increased slightly to 25% for both in 2000. Natural gas and hydro power seem to disappear in 2000, with 2%, while in the last two decades, natural gas accounted for 25% and hydro power is 5%.
Overall, both countries witness a great change in the distribution of material in the electric industry. It is clear that Australia focuses on coal most while France has a tendency to consider nuclear power as a vital source in electric production.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 11
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59923664122 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53845489969 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507633587786 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.075078566 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.416666667 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261154597231 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111325223749 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106586201216 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205083209182 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120607667961 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.