The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate the data of different fuel sources used to produce units of electricity in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

Overall, the majority of units of electricity were produced from coal in Australia in between 1980 and 2000, meanwhile, nuclear power made a large amount of units in France in year 2000.

Now turning to details, in Australia, total 100 units of electricity were produced in 1980, in which, coal made 50 units and hydropower and natural gas both manufactured 40 units. However, oil was also used to make 10 units of electricity. In addition, in 2000, the total count of units produced was 170. In that year coal was used to make 130 units, whereas, oil and natural gas make 4 units. Moreover, 36 units of electricity were manufactured by the use of hydropower.

Aside from that, in 1980, France produced total 90 units of electricity where coal and natural gas was used to make 50 units.furthermore, oil, nuclear power and hydropower sources made 20,15 and 5 units, respectively. On the other hand, in 2000, France manufactured total 180 units of electricity.One third of the units were made from nuclear power, whereas, oil and coal produced 50 units as well as hydropower and natural gas sources made total 4 units of electricity

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-04 Trương Bảo Kiên 78 view
2023-06-04 Trương Bảo Kiên 73 view
2023-06-04 Trương Bảo Kiên 67 view
2023-06-04 Trương Bảo Kiên 89 view
2022-10-07 Blackcytrus 74 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of electricity were manufactured by the use of hydropower. Aside from that, i...
^^
Line 8, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hydropower and natural gas sources made total 4 units of electricity
^^
Line 8, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urces made total 4 units of electricity
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, third, well, whereas, while, in addition, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89908256881 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83925315383 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412844036697 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9978571019 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7 5.23603664747 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252568327471 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136800252643 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890632717338 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202716045197 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922538723174 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.