The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The provided pie charts compare electricity production in Australia and France in two periods of time in 1980 and 2000.
In 1980, Australia produced slightly more units of electricity at 100 than France did at 90 units. Coal consisted of half of all sources used to generate those 100 units; natural gas and hydro power contributed equally to produce 40 units, and oil constituted of producing remaining 10 units in Australia. Similarly, France also relied on natural gas and coal (each produced 25 units) to generate electricity. The latter also used nuclear power to produce 15 units of electricity, which were 5 units less than oil contributed to in the same year.
20 years later, there was a significant difference in the figures. France produced more electricity at 180 units compared to 170 units in Australia. Also, great majority of those units were generated by nuclear power (126 units) in France. In contrast, Australia still relied on coal (130 units) to produce most of its energy. Similarly, both countries significantly decreased the share of natural gas in energy production to 2 units.
The infographics indicate that France and Australia produced nearly the same amount of energy in the given years; however, the charts illustrate the two countries relied on different sources.
- Your body language shapes who you are. Speaker: Amy Cuddy 56
- Do you agree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. 61
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.) 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- The diagrams show a structure that is used to generate electricity from wave power. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14218009479 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80968717047 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535545023697 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9554833952 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6363636364 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305601550372 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132760733043 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119293588358 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230062807227 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129748702944 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.